Comments on: Structure Initialization (All Elements to 0) In C http://www.safercode.com/blog/2009/12/24/structure-initialization-c.html Making Your Code Faster, Stronger, Safer… Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:47:37 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Anish http://www.safercode.com/blog/2009/12/24/structure-initialization-c.html#comment-3536 Anish Sun, 08 Aug 2010 08:57:12 +0000 http://www.safercode.com/blog/2009/12/24/structure-initialization-c.html#comment-3536 Can you site some case when NULL may not be equal to 0? Can you site some case when NULL may not be equal to 0?

]]> By: Jay C. http://www.safercode.com/blog/2009/12/24/structure-initialization-c.html#comment-3461 Jay C. Tue, 29 Dec 2009 20:25:42 +0000 http://www.safercode.com/blog/2009/12/24/structure-initialization-c.html#comment-3461 There was some discussion of this exact topic at my work recently. After looking it up in Harbison, Steele "C: A Reference Manual (5th Edition)", and verifying against various recent and old versions of gcc, we're convinced that the single 0 in the braces is not needed. If it looks cleaner to you, the following should work: struct a b = {}; There was some discussion of this exact topic at my work recently. After looking it up in Harbison, Steele “C: A Reference Manual (5th Edition)”, and verifying against various recent and old versions of gcc, we’re convinced that the single 0 in the braces is not needed. If it looks cleaner to you, the following should work:

struct a b = {};

]]>